Angulo-Lopez v. Dobre
Angulo-Lopez v. Dobre
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40943 Summary Calendar
BASILIO ANGULO-LOPEZ,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
J. DOBRE, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-298 -------------------- October 2, 2002
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Basilio Angulo-Lopez (“Angulo”), federal prisoner # 20864-
086, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241, stemming from
Angelo’s 1993 drug-conspiracy conviction and sentence. The
district court determined that Angulo’s claim that his sentence
violated the Eighth Amendment was not cognizable under
28 U.S.C. § 2241and dismissed the petition.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40943 -2-
Angulo argues that he would have filed a brief in the
district court raising issues concerning the execution of his
sentence, but he does not explain the basis for such a challenge.
Because it was apparent that his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition
challenged only the validity of his sentence, the district court
did not err in dismissing the petition. See Pack v. Yusuff,
218 F.3d 448, 451(5th Cir. 2000).
This appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See
Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983). Because
the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished