Childress v. Johnson
Childress v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40948 Summary Calendar
RICARDO CHILDRESS Plaintiff - Appellant v WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JAMES ZELLER, Warden; ARTHUR ANDERSON; AMADO IGLESIAS; D. R. CHAMBERLAND; TERRY HICKS; WEXFORD; ELDA TANGUMA; AMY ELIZABETH GIBSON; DIEGO CONTRERAS, Defendants - Appellees -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-95-CV-596 -------------------- October 18, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Ricardo Childress (“Childress”), Texas state prisoner #433105, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion requesting leave to properly identify defendants Chamberland and Wexford as parties in the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action that was dismissed in October 1997. Childress’ motion for the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-40948 -2- appointment of counsel is DENIED. The denial of his motion to amend is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See Jacobsen v. Osborne, 133 F.3d 315, 318 (5th Cir. 1998). The magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Childress’ motion because the statute of limitations period has expired, and because defendants Wexford and Chamberland did not receive proper notice that an action was filed against them. See id. at 319-21; FED. R. CIV. P. 15(c). Furthermore, Childress has not established that the identity of defendants Wexford and Chamberland was fraudulently concealed.
AFFIRMED; DENY MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.