Boyce v. Chandler
Boyce v. Chandler
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41487 Summary Calendar
WILLIAM M. BOYCE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
ERNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-630 -------------------- October 22, 2002
Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
William M. Boyce, federal prisoner #03336-088, appeals from
the denial of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition. Boyce argues that
28 U.S.C. § 2255was inadequate to test the legality of his
incarceration, allowing him to pursue
28 U.S.C. § 2241relief,
because Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000), was decided
after his conviction became final and after he filed his
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral
review. Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir.
Sep. 5, 2002),
2002 WL 31006173, *3. Boyce cannot make a showing
sufficient to invoke the “savings clause” of
28 U.S.C. § 2255to
pursue
28 U.S.C. § 2241relief.
Id.AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished