United States v. Ruby
United States v. Ruby
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10011 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TROYCE ARVA RUBY, III, also known as Troyce Ruby,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-129-1-A -------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Troyce Arva Ruby (“Ruby”) appeals the sentencing following
his guilty plea to possession with the intent to distribute
methamphetamine and using and carrying a firearm in relation to
a drug trafficking crime. Ruby argues that the district court
erred in sentencing him as a career offender under U.S.S.G.
§ 4B1.1(c) because his previous conviction for escape was not a
crime of violence.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10011 -2-
This court reviews the district court’s application of the
Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Charles,
301 F.3d 309, 312(5th Cir. 2002). Section 4B1.2 defines a
“crime of violence” as an offense which “has as an element the
use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against
the person of another.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a). Ruby attempted
to escape after he was detained by officers for throwing beer
bottles out of a car window. Ruby’s conviction for escape meets
the definition of a “crime of violence.” See United States
v. Ruiz,
180 F.3d 675(5th Cir. 1999).
Ruby’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished