Keelen v. Cain
Keelen v. Cain
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30364 Conference Calendar
KARSTON KEELEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN,
Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CV-332-D -------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Karston Keelen (“Keelen”), Louisiana state prisoner #125690,
filed a
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint alleging that he was denied
protective custody. Keelen filed this interlocutory appeal from
the denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order
(“TRO”) and preliminary injunction. This court lacks
jurisdiction over the denial of an application for a TRO. See
Faulder v. Johnson,
178 F.3d 741, 742(5th Cir. 1999). However,
the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction is an
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30364 -2-
immediately appealable interlocutory order. See
28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). This court will not address Keelen’s appeal from
the denial of his motion for the appointment of counsel because
this court previously dismissed Keelen’s appeal.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a
preliminary injunction because Keelen has failed to demonstrate a
substantial likelihood that he will prevail on the merits of his
claims. See Farmer v. Brennan,
511 U.S. 825, 837(1994); Women’s
Med. Ctr. v. Bell,
248 F.3d 411, 419 n.15 (5th Cir. 2001).
Accordingly, the appeal from the district court’s denial of
a TRO is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The district
court’s denial of injunctive relief is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished