Cuc v. Ashcroft
Cuc v. Ashcroft
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-60162 Summary Calendar
MARIO A. CUC, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A74 291 809 -------------------- October 23, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Mario Alvaran Cuc petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum and for withholding of deportation. He argues that a reasonable fact-finder would be compelled to conclude that his fear of persecution is well-founded. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and that the evidence in the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. -2- U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.