United States v. Peacock
United States v. Peacock
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10564 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOE BAILEY PEACOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-30-1-A -------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Joe Bailey Peacock has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Peacock has received a copy of counsel's motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-10564 -2- from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.