Rankin v. Haro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Rankin v. Haro

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30651 Conference Calendar

VICTOR RANKIN, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH HARO,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CV-53 -------------------- December 11, 2002

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Rankin, federal prisoner #05378-067, filed a notice

of appeal from an order of the district court construing his

petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

as a

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and transferring it to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rankin argues that the district court should have given him

notice or should have obtained his consent before

“recharacterizing” his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition as a successive

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30651 -2-

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and that the Third Circuit is without

jurisdiction to consider his case.

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. See Mosley v. Cozby,

813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). We lack jurisdiction over the district court’s

interlocutory transfer order. See Brinar v. Williamson,

245 F.3d 515, 517-18

(5th Cir. 2001). Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished