United States v. Cedillo-Aguirre

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Cedillo-Aguirre

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50264 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS CEDILLO-AGUIRRE,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-528-ALL-WWJ -------------------- December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Cedillo-Aguirre (“Cedillo”) appeals the sentencing

following his jury conviction for illegal reentry into the United

States following deportation. Cedillo contends that

8 U.S.C. § 1326

(b)(2) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior

conviction for an aggravated felony as a mere sentencing factor

and not an element of the offense. Cedillo concedes that his

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50264 -2-

U.S. 224 (1998), but he nevertheless seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466

(2000).

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90

; United States v. Dabeit,

231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,

531 U.S. 1202

(2001). Cedillo’s

argument is foreclosed. Therefore, Cedillo’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished