In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _______________

m 02-50887 Summary Calendar _______________

ARLENE P. MATA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas m SA-01-CV-741 _________________________

December 20, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and Arlene Mata sued her employer, the San CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. Antonio Housing Authority, for racial discrim- ination, alleging that it fired her because she is PER CURIAM:* Hispanic. The magistrate judge, acting as the district court by consent, found no issues of * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum- (...continued) (continued...) stances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. material fact and granted summary judgment to the Authority. Appearing pro se, Mata appeals.

We have read the briefs and have consulted pertinent portions of the record. On the basis of applicable caselaw and the summary judg- ment record, we affirm, essentially for the rea- sons given by the magistrate judge in her com- prehensive Memorandum of Decision and Order dated and filed August 6, 2002, and entered on August 7, 2002.

AFFIRMED.

2