U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2002

Coggin v. Longview Independent School District

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2002 · Barksdale, Benavides, Clement, Davis, Demoss, Dennis, Garza, Higginbotham, Jolly, Jones, King, Smith, Stewart, Wiener

309 F.3d 307; 19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 288; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21001; 2002 WL 31248878 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Andy Wade Tindel (argued), Provost, Umphrey, Youngdahl & Sadin, Charles H. Clark, Clark, Lea & Ainsworth, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Eric W. Schulze (argued), JoAnn S. Wright, Walsh, Anderson, Brown, Schulze & Aldridge, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant., Denise Nance Pierce, Bickerstaff, Heath, Smiley, Pollan, Kever & McDaniel, Jennifer Piskun Johnson, Graves, Dough-erty, Hearon & Moody, Austin, TX, for Texas Ass’n of School Boards Legal Assistance Fund, Amicus Curiae.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Coggin v. Longview Indep Sch (5th Cir. 2003)
Coggin v. Longview Independent School District (5th Cir. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

*308Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.1 BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.