IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30228

ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DREDGING SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant - Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Third Party Defendant - Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 01-CV-1224-M -------------------- January 3, 2003 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals from the summary judgment decision of the district court dismissing its claims against appellee.

Specifically, appellant contends that the district court erred by using the complaint-allegation rule. See, e.g., Selective Ins.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Co. of Southeast v. J.B. Mouton & Sons, Inc., 954 F.2d 1075, 1078 (5th Cir. 1992) (applying Louisiana law and employing its complaint-allegation rule). Appellant also complains that the district court erred in finding that the complaint was limited in a manner that did not impose liability on appellee.

We have considered the briefs and the arguments advanced by the parties at oral argument and we find no error in the district court’s determination as reflected in its order dismissing claims against appellee. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.