UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60404, 02-60411, 02-60419, 02-60457, 02-60458, 02-60481, 02-60517, 02-60536 Summary Calendar

_______________________

Case No. 02-60404

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JESSE WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60411

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SUSIE GEORGE, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60419

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LINDA HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Case No. 02-60457

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CURRY JOE ATTERBURY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60458

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RUBIN ASHFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60481

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARY BURT, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________

Case No. 02-60517

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

L.D. TAYLOR, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Case No. 02-60536

BANK ONE NA,

2 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MARY McMORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (3:01-CV-24-D) _____________________________________________

January 29, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings

granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the

Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is

indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the

related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.

Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our

opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1

(5th Cir. 2002). 2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).

3 N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgment of the

district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

3

(S.D. Miss. 2001). 4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel arbitration).

4