U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Iraheta-Barrera

United States v. Iraheta-Barrera
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2003

United States v. Iraheta-Barrera

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41103 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MERCEDES ANTONIO IRAHETA-BARRERA, also known as Mario Diaz-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-313-1 -------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Mercedes Antonio Iraheta-Barrera (“Iraheta”) appeals from his conviction of having been found in the United States after having been deported, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

For the first time on appeal, Iraheta contends that the magistrate judge was without jurisdiction or authority to conduct his guilty-plea hearing because the district court had not yet formally referred the case to the magistrate judge. By failing

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 01-41103 -2- to object in the district court to the magistrate judge’s exercise of authority, Iraheta waived his right to challenge this procedural defect in his plea proceeding. United States v. Bolivar-Munoz, 313 F.3d 253, 256-57 (5th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.