McNeil-Bey v. Chandler
McNeil-Bey v. Chandler
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41508 Conference Calendar
GERALD TIMOTHY McNEIL-BEY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
ERNEST CHANDLER, Warden, United States Penitentiary Beaumont,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-215 -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gerald Timothy McNeil-Bey, federal prisoner #70984-079,
appeals from the dismissal of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241habeas corpus
petition. McNeil-Bey contends that the time-bar provision of
28 U.S.C. § 2255is unfair and effectively bars prisoners from
seeking
28 U.S.C. § 2255relief. McNeil-Bey suggests that the
time-bar provision renders
28 U.S.C. § 2255inadequate, allowing
him to seek relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. McNeil-Bey argues
that he could not be convicted of conspiracy because his alleged
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-41508 -2-
coconspirator was acquitted; that he received ineffective
assistance of counsel because the elements of his offenses were
not explained to him; that there was no factual basis for his
guilty plea because he denied that there was any conspiracy and
denied knowledge about the firearm involved in the offense; and
that he could not be convicted of conspiracy merely because he
was present at the scene of a crime.
McNeil-Bey does not rely on any retroactively applicable
Supreme Court decisions indicating that he may have been
convicted of a nonexistent offense, as is required to proceed
under
28 U.S.C. § 2241by Reyes-Requena v. United States,
243 F.3d 893, 904(5th Cir. 2001). He has not shown that the
district court erred by dismissing his habeas corpus petition.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished