U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Odiodio

United States v. Odiodio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 12, 2003

United States v. Odiodio

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10473 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BONIFACE SULEMAN ODIODIO, also known as Boniface Odiodio Suleman, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-236-2-D -------------------- February 12, 2003 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Boniface Suleman Odiodio was convicted of wire fraud and money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1343, and 1957.

Odiodio appeals from the district court’s order denying his Rule motion for correction or reduction of sentence and his Rule 36 motion for correction of clerical error. In addition, Odiodio appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights claim. Odiodio has shown no entitlement to relief. See United * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 02-10473 -2- States v. Lopez, 26 F.3d 512, 518-19 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Massey, 827 F.2d 995, 1005 n.1 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994).

The order of the district court is AFFIRMED. All outstanding motions are DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.