United States v. Trotty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Trotty

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10580 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR LAMONT TROTTY, also known as Victor Lamont, also known as Pinkie Trotty, also known as Pinkie Lope, also known as Pinky Trotty,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-107-1-C -------------------- February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor

Lamont Trotty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Trotty has filed a response to counsel’s brief. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Trotty’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10580 -2-

response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Reference

Status
Unpublished