Moody v. Johnson
Moody v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40463 Summary Calendar
DONALD MOODY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-10 -------------------- February 5, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donald Moody, Texas prisoner # 677242, appeals the
district court’s denial of his
28 U.S.C. § 1651petition for writ
of error coram nobis, challenging his 1993 conviction for two
counts of attempted murder. Although Moody contends that the
district court erred in failing to consider the merits of his
petition, he briefs no argument challenging the reasons for the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40463 -2-
district court’s denial, and he has thus waived the sole ground for
appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 224-25(5th Cir.
1993). Even if the argument has not been waived, Moody cannot show
any error in the district court’s judgment because, as the district
court determined, he remains in custody on the challenged
conviction, rendering him ineligible for coram nobis relief. See
Jimenez v. Trominski,
91 F.3d 767, 768(5th Cir. 1996).
Moody’s appeal is wholly without arguable merit, is
frivolous, and is therefore DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. 42.2; Howard v.
King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983). We CAUTION Moody that
any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the
imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Moody is further
CAUTIONED to review pending appeals to ensure that they do not
raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished