Fuenmayor v. Conner
Fuenmayor v. Conner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40713 Conference Calendar
AURELIO HEREDIA FUENMAYOR,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
N. L. CONNER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-101 -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Aurelio Heredia Fuenmayor, federal prisoner #34560-004,
appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition. Fuenmayor argues that his conviction was
rendered nonexistent by the ineffective assistance of his defense
counsel. The district court concluded that, because Fuenmayor’s
petition challenged the legality of his convictions, it was in
the nature of a
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion to vacate, but that
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40713 -2-
Fuenmayor had not satisfied the “savings clause” of that statute.
See Pack v. Yusuff,
218 F.3d 448, 452(5th Cir. 2000).
Fuenmayor has failed to make the requisite showing that the
remedy provided for under
28 U.S.C. § 2255is inadequate or
ineffective to test the legality of his detention. See
Reyes-Requena v. United States,
243 F.3d 893, 904(5th Cir.
2001). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished