Fuenmayor v. Conner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Fuenmayor v. Conner

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40713 Conference Calendar

AURELIO HEREDIA FUENMAYOR,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

N. L. CONNER, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-101 -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Aurelio Heredia Fuenmayor, federal prisoner #34560-004,

appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition. Fuenmayor argues that his conviction was

rendered nonexistent by the ineffective assistance of his defense

counsel. The district court concluded that, because Fuenmayor’s

petition challenged the legality of his convictions, it was in

the nature of a

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion to vacate, but that

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40713 -2-

Fuenmayor had not satisfied the “savings clause” of that statute.

See Pack v. Yusuff,

218 F.3d 448, 452

(5th Cir. 2000).

Fuenmayor has failed to make the requisite showing that the

remedy provided for under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

is inadequate or

ineffective to test the legality of his detention. See

Reyes-Requena v. United States,

243 F.3d 893, 904

(5th Cir.

2001). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished