United States v. Provencio-Barraza
United States v. Provencio-Barraza
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-41354 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUBEN PROVENCIO-BARRAZA, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-429-1 -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed by the district court to represent Ruben Provencio-Barraza (“Provencio”) on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Provencio has received a copy of counsel’s motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-41354 -2- withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.