Crompton v. Casterline
Crompton v. Casterline
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-31207 Conference Calendar
DEWAYNE ALBERT CROMPTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus CARL CASTERLINE, Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CV-1854 -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Dewayne Albert Crompton, federal prisoner # 03502-090, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. Crompton argues that his remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate and that he has satisfied the savings clause requirements of that statute.
Crompton has not met the requisites for bringing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the savings clause. See Wesson v. U.S.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-31207 -2- Penitentiary Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 1374 (2003).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.