United States v. Fields
United States v. Fields
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 17, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-50690 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CR-114-ALL -------------------- Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Sherman Lamont Fields has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although he was granted extensions of time to file a response to his counsel’s motion, Fields has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-50690 -2- counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to extend the time for Fields to file an amended brief is DENIED.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE AN AMENDED BRIEF DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.