U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

Rheams v. Marler

Rheams v. Marler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 21, 2003

Rheams v. Marler

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 20, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-30959 Summary Calendar

HELEN RHEAMS, on behalf of Walter James Rheams; TAMMY RHEAMS; ALISHA MONIQUE THOMAS, on behalf of Jamilah Monet Rheams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus VICTOR MARLER, ETC.; ET AL., Defendants, VICTOR MARLER, Officer; UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.; JASON POE; LARRY JONES, Special Agent; WILLIE GRAVES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-912 -------------------- Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appellants appeal from a judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 02-30959 -2- They assign error to the district court’s determination that Walter Rheams’s pending criminal proceedings mandated that the suit be dismissed or, alternatively, stayed until resolution of the criminal proceedings. Rheams’s death during the pendency of this appeal, however, necessarily brings a premature end to his criminal proceedings. See United States v. Estate of Parsons, 314 F.3d 745, 748 (5th Cir. 2002). We therefore vacate the judgment of the district court dismissing the suit and remand the case for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.