U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Perez

United States v. Perez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 24, 2003

United States v. Perez

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-20906 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDERICO PEREZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-43 -------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Trude K. Scott, the attorney appointed to represent Federico Perez, Jr., on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review of counsel’s brief and Perez’s response and our independent review of the record show that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 01-20906 -2- responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.