U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

Ralston v. Sisneros

Ralston v. Sisneros
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2003

Ralston v. Sisneros

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51194 Conference Calendar

BOBBY JOE RALSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus W. SISNEROS, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CV-361-JN -------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Bobby Joe Ralston, federal prisoner # 82483-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the Bureau of Prison’s (“BOP”) calculation of his 60-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Ralston argues that his federal sentence should run concurrently to a state-imposed sentence and that he should be given federal credit for the time he spent in state custody.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 02-51194 -2- The judgment in Ralston’s case was silent on whether to run his federal sentence concurrently or consecutively to his anticipated state sentence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in concluding that the sentences should run consecutively. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991). Furthermore, the court did not err in concluding that Ralston was not entitled to federal credit for the time he spent in state custody. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.