U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

Duran v. Tombone

Duran v. Tombone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 24, 2003

Duran v. Tombone

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40166 Conference Calendar

TONY FUENTE DURAN, Petitioner-Appellant, versus JOHN M. TOMBONE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-762 -------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Tony Fuente Duran, federal prisoner # 66501-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Duran argues that the district court erred in not addressing his actual-innocence claim on the merits. Duran has failed to identify a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense. His claim, therefore, does not satisfy the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and he is not entitled to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 03-40166 -2- utilize 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893 (5th Cir. 2001). This appeal is without arguable merit and, therefore, it is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.