The Government appeals from the sentence imposed on Jose Antonio Silva-Segura (“Silva”) for illegal reentry following deportation. The Government contends that the district court erred by failing to impose a 16-level upward adjustment to Silva’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) for a previous conviction of transporting aliens for financial gain, an offense the Government argues was a conviction of an alien smuggling offense committed for profit. Silva concedes error but presents an argument against the 16-level adjustment to preserve the issue for further review.

Transporting aliens for profit is an “alien smuggling offense committed for profit,” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), warranting the 16-level upward adjustment. United States v. Solis-Campozano, 312 F.3d 164, 167 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 1811, 155 L.Ed.2d 689 (2003). Pursuant to SolisCampozano, which was decided after the imposition of sentence on Silva, a 16-level adjustment was appropriate for Silva’s conviction of transporting aliens for financial gain.

VACATED AND REMANDED.