U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Jimenez-Salazar

United States v. Jimenez-Salazar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 15, 2003

United States v. Jimenez-Salazar

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21217 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIANA LETICIA JIMENEZ-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-570-3 -------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Diana Leticia Jimenez-Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez has filed a motion requesting the appointment of new counsel and an extension of time to investigate the merits of her appeal. Jimenez does not raise issues for this courts review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 02-21217 -2- Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jimenez’s motion for appointment of new counsel and for an extension of time is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.