United States v. Nuno-Tinoco

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Nuno-Tinoco

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10399 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

IGNACIO NUNO-TINOCO, also known as Jose Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-402-ALL-D --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ignacio

Nuno-Tinoco on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967).

Nuno has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this

direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Status
Unpublished