Jamar Anderson appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. *955 He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress by considering his prior conviction when making a credibility determination between the conflicting testimony of a defense witness and two police officers. We find nothing in the district court’s order that supports an inference that the inclusion of the term “convicted felon” suggests any impropriety.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.