Philip Brady appeals, pro se, the summary judgment dismissal of his action against Randall Gelino. Brady contends that Gelino’s defense to the action is nullified because he was improperly represented by government attorneys. However, neither Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 105 S.Ct. 3099, 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985), nor 28 C.F.R. § 50.15 bar government representation of government employees sued in their individual capacity. “We doubt in any event that the rules regarding representation by the government of its employees are intended for the protection of opposing litigants....” Bontkowski v. Smith, 305 F.3d 757, 760 (7th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED