Warren Pierre Canady, Texas prisoner # 728784, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in which he challenged his conviction for theft. As an initial matter, Canady’s motions to supplement, which request that the record be supplemented with documents already part of the record on appeal, are DENIED. His motion to file a supplemental reply brief is GRANTED.

Canady argues that he was denied a speedy trial. Although the 17-month delay is “presumptively prejudicial,” United States v. Garcia, 995 F.2d 556, 560 (5th Cir. 1993), and Canady timely asserted his right to a speedy trial, our review of the record reveals that Canady failed to satisfy the other factors (reason for the delay and resulting prejudice) announced in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 515, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). See Nelson v. Hargett, 989 F.2d 847, 852 (5th Cir. 1993); Cowart v. Hargett, 16 F.3d 642, 647 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.