Alexander Jackson appeals his conviction by a jury for being a felon in posses *672 sion of a firearm. He asserts that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the item in question was a “firearm” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3). After reviewing the record and the arguments of counsel, we hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find that the item in question was in fact a “firearm.” See United States v. Blevinal, 607 F.2d 1124, 1128 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Seastrunk, 580 F.2d 800, 802 (5th Cir. 1978). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.