Defendant-Appellant Darryl L. Williams appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Williams contends on appeal that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because the district court properly advised him of the maximum possible penalty for the offense of conviction, however, Williams cannot prevail on his argument that his reliance on misinformation from both prosecution and defense counsel about the likely period of incarceration rendered the plea involuntary. United States v. Gracia, 983 F.2d 625, 629 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Fed. R.Crim. P. 11(d)(2).

The record indicates that Williams knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). As a result, Williams waived his arguments that the district court erred in overruling his objection to the PSR and by applying the cross-reference of § 2K2.1(c).

AFFIRMED.