Bruce Lee, Jr., appeals his conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and using and carrying of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Lee argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized both incident to a warrantless arrest and as the result of a search of his residence pursuant to a warrant.

*723 The district court correctly determined that officers entered Lee’s hotel room to arrest him upon the voluntary consent of a third party with actual or apparent authority to consent. See United States v. Jaras, 86 F.3d 383, 389 (5th Cir. 1996). The district court was also correct in its determination that the search of Lee’s residence was based upon objectively reasonable, good-faith reliance upon a search warrant. See United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.