Fleming v. Crane

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Fleming v. Crane, 83 F. App'x 603 (5th Cir. 2003)
Davis, Dennis, Emilio, Garza, Per Curiam

Fleming v. Crane

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

IT IS ORDERED that the motion by Mittie Fleming for reconsideration of the Deputy Clerk’s order denying her leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED. Payment of the appellate filing fee would not be an undue hardship. See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339, 69 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed. 43 (1948). Additionally, Fleming has not shown a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Carson v. Polley 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mittie FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allen Lee CRANE, Insured by State Farm Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished