Brian Nolley appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute mixtures containing cocaine and cocaine base. Nolley’s sentence was increased pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) because a firearm was possessed. He argues that the Government’s failure to allege his use or possession of a firearm in the indictment rendered his judgment of conviction invalid under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Nolley’s Apprendi argument is foreclosed by our holding in United States v. Randle, 304 F.3d 373, 378 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1748, 155 L.Ed.2d 514 (2003).

Nolley also contends that his judgment of conviction is invalid on the same ground under Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002). He asserts that, despite contrary language in Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), the holding of Harris is suspect in light of Ring. Nolley’s arguments regarding Ring and Harris are wholly lacking in merit.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.