Counsel appointed for defendant John Harvey Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Johnson has filed a response in which he argues that his guilty plea was involuntary, his trial counsel was ineffective, and the district court abused its discretion. We decline to address the ineffective assistance claims raised by Johnson in this proceeding. See United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir. 1998).

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Johnson’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Because there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal, Johnson’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Cf United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.