4-Mali L.L.C. (“4-Mali”) appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing its complaint claiming flood insurance coverage. The district court held that 4-Mali’s claims were not covered by a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”), and that, in any event, 4-Mali had failed to comply with the SFIP’s procedural requirements. We hold that the district court did not err in finding that 4-Mali’s failure to provide a proof of loss statement within sixty days of the flood precludes coverage. See Gowland v. Aetna, 143 F.3d 951, 953-54 (5th *971 Cir. 1998). As such, we need not evaluate the scope of the SFIP’s coverage. The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED.