Jacob Brislis appeals from his jury-trial conviction for possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Brislis argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for possession of firearms during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense.

The record contains sufficient evidence to support Brislis’ conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The jury has the role of assessing the credibility of witnesses. United States v. Deville, 278 F.3d 500, 506 (5th Cir. 2002). “The evidence *843 does not need to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence; the jury is free to choose among reasonable interpretations of the evidence.” United States v. Perrien, 274 F.3d 936, 939-40 (5th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.