Orix Credit Alliance appeals an adverse decision in the district eourt-which adopted the holdings of the bankruptcy court-arguing that: (1) the bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the contract dispute; and (2) if that court were vested with jurisdiction, it erred in entering a take-nothing judgment. Both contentions are misplaced.

The bankruptcy court clearly had jurisdiction to adjudicate this contract dispute *393 that was “related to” the bankruptcy case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). We cannot say that the bankruptcy court, after properly exercising jurisdiction, committed clear error in finding that a contract had not been formed and in entering a take-nothing judgment.

For these reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.