U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

Kinney v. Weaver

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2003 · Barksdale, Benavides, Clement, Davis, Demoss, Dennis, Garza, Higginbotham, Jolly, Jones, King, Prado, Smith, Stewart, Wiener

338 F.3d 432; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117; 2003 WL 21635028 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Curtis B. Stuckey, Alex Arthur Castet-ter, Stuckey, Garrigan & Castetter, Nac-ogdoches, TX, Leslie Stephen Mendelsohn, Les Mendelsohn & Associates, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintffs-Appellees., Gregory Duane Smith, Herschel Tracy Crawford, Ramey & Flock, Tyler TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 31, 2002, 5th Cir., 2002, 301 F.3d 253)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.