Jesus Jorge Melhan’s supervised release was revoked, and he appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the revocation petition. Melhan argues that the almost five-year delay in executing the violator’s warrant violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.

The Sixth Amendment provides an accused the right to a speedy trial “[i]n all *417criminal prosecutions!.]” The revocation of supervised release is not a criminal proceeding. United States v. Marmolejo, 915 F.2d 981, 983 (5th Cir. 1990). Thus, “the execution of a warrant for violation of supervised release is not subject to the Sixth Amendment’s speedy trial requirement.” United States v. Tippens, 39 F.3d 88, 89-90 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.