U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Lamothe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 10, 2003

82 F. App'x 890

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

The lawyer appointed to represent Roderick Lamothe on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.