United States v. Hogle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit January 5, 2004

United States v. Hogle, 84 F. App'x 437 (5th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Gregory Walter Hogle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hogle has filed a pro se response brief, but he fails to identify any nonfrivolous appellant issues. Our independent review of the briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is ex *438 cused from further responsibilities; and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Walter HOGLE, Defendant-Appellant
Status: Unpublished