United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D Revised January 6, 2004 December 8, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk __________________________ No. 03-30195 __________________________

In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of RIVER CITY TOWING SERVICES, INC, As Owner of the T/B K700, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability ------------------------------------ RIVER CITY TOWING SERVICES, INC, As Owner of the T/B K700 Petitioner, SABRILLE ACKLIN, and other third-party plaintiffs as set forth in record document no. 90 Claimants - Third-Party Plaintiffs, versus FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP, also known as Formosa Chemical, doing business as Formosa Chemical Claimant - Third-Party Defendant - Appellant, versus THERESA ELLEN WILLIAMS; CRYSTAL SMITH; GERTRUDE TAYLOR; TYRON MARTIN, SR; LINDA BARNEY; MICHAEL GREEN; EULA BATISTE; ROSE MARY BRODEN Claimants - Appellees.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (No. 01-CV-1935-J) ___________________________________________________

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Formasa Plastics Corporation appeals the district court’s determination that it did not have admiralty jurisdiction to hear this matter. Because the tort at issue here occurred on land and hence fails the location test, the district court did not err in holding that it did not have admiralty jurisdiction over the claims. See Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, Co., 513 U.S. 527, 534 (1995). Furthermore, once the district properly dismissed all of the claims which may have led to original jurisdiction, it did not abuse its discretion in refusing to exercise pendant jurisdiction over the pending state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The decision of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.