Haregewoin Mamo Desta petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision to deny her application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as well as the BIA’s rejection' of her claim under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Desta argues that the BIA erred in determining that she had not established a well-founded fear of future persecution or that it was more likely than not that she would be tortured if she were returned to Ethiopia.

This court will-uphold the factual findings that an alien is not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994). The substantial evidence standard requires that the decision be based on the evidence presented and that the decision be substantially reasonable. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The BIA’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and the *983 record does not compel a contrary conclusion as to either Desta’s INA claims or her CAT claim. See id. Accordingly, Desta’s petition for review is DENIED.