Clarence Wayne Robinson was convicted after a jury trial of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), (b)(1)(C); possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A); and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). He appeals, arguing that the district court erred in ruling that he did not have standing to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge to the validity of the search of an apartment.

Although Robinson may have had a subjective expectation of privacy in the apartment, any such expectation was not one which society would recognize as reasonable. 1 The district court did not err in *381 ruling that Robinson did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the apartment.

AFFIRMED.