United States v. Stribling

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Stribling

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10627 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENICE STRIBLING,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-111-3-P --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kevin Ross, the Federal Public Defender appointed to

represent Genice Stribling, has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Stribling has filed a response to Ross’s

motion. Our independent review of the record, Ross’s brief, and

Stribling’s response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal. Accordingly, Ross’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, the Federal Public Defender is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-10627 -2-

responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Reference

Status
Unpublished