This appeal arises out of a jury award for general and special damages resulting from a car accident in April 2001. Appellant Fabian Shawl argues that the jury erred by awarding only $12,000 in general damages for pain and suffering. Shawl made the same argument before the district court in a Rule 59 motion arguing for *371 an increase in the general damages awarded by the jury. On April 7, 2003, the district court issued a written order denying Shawl’s motion for additur. We review a district court’s award of damages for clear error. See Nichols v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 17 F.3d 119, 121 (5th Cir. 1994) (“[M]ere disagreement with the district court’s analysis of the record is insufficient ... we will not reverse a finding although there is evidence to support it, unless the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). After closely reviewing the record below, we find no clear error and agree with the district court’s well-reasoned resolution of this matter.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.